Tyga has confirmed that he used artificial intelligence (AI) as a production tool on his ninth studio album, $tarface, which hit the market on July 31, 2026. In a recent Vibe interview, the Californian rapper made it clear that he is unbothered by any backlash from listeners.

The rapper explained that $tarface embraces an ’80s synth‑pop aesthetic and introduces a new $tarface persona. He said the album required certain sounds that he could not produce in the studio, prompting the use of AI for specific instrumental elements. "We definitely used AI as a tool. If you like it, you like it; if you don’t, you don’t," Tyga told Vibe, likening the technology to Auto‑Tune. He noted that early adopters of that effect faced criticism but ultimately saw it integrated into mainstream music.

Tyga clarified that AI was employed only for select parts, such as ’80s synths or a quick guitar solo. "I need some ’80s synths for a certain part of this song. I need a guitar solo done ASAP," he said. He emphasized that all vocal recordings and the overall production were done without AI.

His admission comes amid a broader debate about AI in music. Earlier this week, Luke Steele of Empire of The Sun described AI as "just another tool," comparing it to a "smart guitar pedal." Boy George revealed that AI helped write his pro‑Israel reggae track "We Will Dance Again," which was later removed from Bandcamp for violating the platform’s AI policy. Other artists have voiced concerns: Mac DeMarco, SZA, and Lorde have criticized the influence of AI, while Jack Antonoff has called artists who use AI "godless whores." Daft Punk’s Thomas Bangalter described AI as a way to bypass the creative process.

Industry responses to AI‑generated music are mixed. Apple Music announced plans to label tracks that contain AI‑generated content, following a study that found 97 % of listeners could not distinguish between human‑made and AI‑made music. Deezer reported that AI‑generated music now accounts for more than 50 % of daily uploads on its platform. In June, TIDAL stated it would not pay royalties for music created entirely by AI.

Last summer, several global music‑industry bodies issued an open letter urging artists and songwriters to obtain consent before entering AI agreements. High‑profile musicians such as Paul McCartney, Kate Bush, Dua Lipa, and Elton John had previously campaigned for governmental protection of musicians’ work.

Tyga’s admission adds to the growing list of artists openly acknowledging AI’s role in production. While he frames the technology as a neutral tool, the broader conversation continues to grapple with questions of authorship, royalties, and creative integrity.

The current situation remains fluid. Tyga has not announced any further releases that rely on AI, and no regulatory body has issued new mandates specific to AI‑generated music. Industry stakeholders are monitoring developments from streaming platforms and legal frameworks that could shape how AI tools are used in the future.

In summary, Tyga’s statement confirms that AI was used to generate certain instrumental parts on $tarface, while vocals and overall production were performed without AI. The discussion reflects ongoing tensions between technological innovation and artistic control in the music industry.